Difference Between Consequentialism and Utilitarianism. It is important to be able to recognize the dissimilarity of these two views. Erikson’s theory is about psychosocial development whereas Kohlberg’s theory is about moral development. The main representative of consequentialism is called utilitarianism, and deontology is derived from Kant. In this essay, I will more concentrate on consequentialism, especially utilitarianism, and deontology to make compare and contrast analysis of each other and how each case works differently and causes divergent result in the same scenario. The greatest happiness principle, used by utilitarianism, is that an act is right as far as it tends to produce the greatest happiness for the greatest amount of people. Consequentialism — The morality of an action is determined by the specific results of that action. Deontology and consequentialism are two contrasting, normative ethical theories that determine the morality of an action. Utilitarianism and deontological theory have their similarities and differences in the philosophical world. The focal point of deontology is the concept of duty; deontology is derived from the Greek word deon (duty). For example, love includes wanting happiness and religious principles such as loving others the way you love yourself and doing to others what you expect them to you are founded on utilitarian, A Comparative Essay Analysis of the Ethical Theories of Aristotle vs. his Contemporary, Epictetus. Utilitarianism, nicknamed “The Greatest Happiness” states that the ethical choice is the choice that yields the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest amount of people.
The distinction does allow individual moral relativism to be compared to ethical egoism. Deontology — The morality of an action is determined by duty; adherence to given rules. When evaluate one action is moral or not, the consequentialism and the deontology don’t share the same standards. Kantian ethics, also called duty ethics, explains that for any action, people must act according to common principles, with no significance placed on the outcome. The deontology consider “right” and “duty” as the basic concepts, they believe that other moral concepts can be defined by them. It is also referred to as moral philosophy and analyzes the principles that decide the behavior of an individual or a group. By exploring the way individual, Topic 1 On differences between women and men in leadership behaviour", Leadership & Organization Development Journal, vol. Many philosophers argue that people should be just and ethical because it is the only source of true and, individuals may suffer from these actions, utilitarianism holds that the conduct may still be ethical if it does more good for a greater number of people than it harms. A deontologist will condemn a thief on the basis that he has broken the moral imperative that commands one not to steal. Consequentialism consider “value” and “good” as the basic concept, they believe that the concept of obligatory must be defined by them, while moral should be judged by the purpose or consequence arising … A personal experience to explain the relationship between virtue, values, and moral concepts as they relate to one of the three theories
Consequentialism focuses on the consequences or results of an action. HRE4M1-03 Together with deontology and consequentialism, virtue ethics is currently considered as a dominant approach to normative ethics. Consequentialism and deontology form part of the common approaches to moral thought.
Problems Of Youth And Their Solutions Essay,
Shredded Sweet Potato Fritters,
Introduction To General Relativity And Cosmology Pdf,
Balsamic Soy Ginger Dressing,
What To Say To A Child Having Surgery,
Live Marigold Plants For Sale,
Marie's Spinach Salad Dressing,